ISSN 2394-5125
 

Research Article 


SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E..

Abstract
Students of higher educational institutions (universities) constitute a special social layer of the population, united by
a certain age, specific learning conditions and lifestyle. Mastering the sciences requires huge amounts of energy,
psycho-emotional stress, physical effort, mobilization of the body’s reserves from young people. (1,4,8)
Student youth is one of the main reserves of highly qualified specialists for various sectors of the national
economy. Modern students will have to realize in the future the most important social functions of society:
professional, labor, reproductive, intellectual and moral, etc. (5,6)
Expensive mass medical examinations are carried out to determine the state of health in different countries,
meanwhile, an important criterion is self-assessment of health, the determination of which is relatively easy to
perform among different categories of the population. The Health Survey questionnaire, developed in accordance
with the 8020 program "Was used in Japan and some other countries of the world to evaluate oral health, related
lifestyle, general health and quality of life of the population, but similar studies have not been conducted in Russia
before. (4,7,9,10)
In connection with the foregoing, the use of sociological research methods to study the relationship
between dental and general health of students is an important and relevant area of scientific research.

Key words: The aim of the study is to substantiate the use of sociological methods for studying the relationship between dental and general health of university students.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Ismatov F.A.
Articles by Khasanova L.E.
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E.. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. JCR. 2020; 7(4): 2553-2556. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.04.390


Web Style

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E.. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. http://www.jcreview.com/?mno=134539 [Access: May 31, 2021]. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.04.390


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E.. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. JCR. 2020; 7(4): 2553-2556. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.04.390



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E.. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. JCR. (2020), [cited May 31, 2021]; 7(4): 2553-2556. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.04.390



Harvard Style

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E. (2020) SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. JCR, 7 (4), 2553-2556. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.04.390



Turabian Style

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E.. 2020. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7 (4), 2553-2556. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.04.390



Chicago Style

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E.. "SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS." Journal of Critical Reviews 7 (2020), 2553-2556. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.04.390



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E.. "SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS." Journal of Critical Reviews 7.4 (2020), 2553-2556. Print. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.04.390



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Ismatov F.A., Khasanova L.E. (2020) SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL AND GENERAL HEALTH OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7 (4), 2553-2556. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.04.390